ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY / CLINICAL RESEARCH
How often is right-power ablation equal to highpower ablation during pulmonary vein isolation under temperature control? Does the learning curve matter?
More details
Hide details
1
I Chair and Department of Cardiology, Medical University of Warszaw, Poland
2
Department and Clinic of Emergency Medicine, Wrocław, Poland
Submission date: 2021-12-28
Final revision date: 2022-02-06
Acceptance date: 2022-03-15
Online publication date: 2022-04-04
Corresponding author
Edward Koźluk
I Chair and Department of
Cardiology
Medical University of Warsaw,
Banacha 1A,
02-097 Warszawa, Poland
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Introduction:
The energy applied under temperature control (TC) has a more predictable effect than the one applied under power control. The currently introduced cooled-tip DiamondTemp catheter (DT) restores the ability to adjust radiofrequency (RF) power to the temperature at the electrode-tissue interface. It also enables high-power (HP) ablation procedures. Aim of the study was to assess how often ablation with TC at a 50 W nominal setting meets HP ablation criteria. We analyzed the influence of the learning curve on the results.
Material and methods:
The course of 3350 applications performed using DT in 20 patients (14 M, age 55 ±13 years) with atrial fibrillation/left atrial flutter was analyzed. 24 applications with 1–2 s duration were excluded. Average (Pavg), minimal (Pmin), and maximal (Pmax) power were evaluated. The percentage of applications > 45 and > 50 W (Pmin > 49 W) was assessed.
Results:
From 3326 applications with the duration > 2 s only 1430 (43%) were between 3 and 10 s (excellent catheter/muscle contact). There was an insignificant trend to increase the percentage of short applications during the learning curve (p = 0.054). Pmin > 45, > 49 or > 50 W was recorded during 3130 (94.1%), 2963 (89.1%) and 98 (1.1%) applications, respectively. Pavg 45 or 50 W was recorded during 3230 (97.1%) and 2700 (81.2%) applications, Pmax during 3296 (99.1%) and 3269 (98.3%) applications. The percentage of applications with Pavg and Pmin > 45/> 50 (49) W (but not Pmax) significantly decreased during the procedures in the second subgroup of patients.
Conclusions:
Pmax seems not to be as good a criterion for classification of application as HP. Most TC applications performed with the DT meet the criteria for HP ablation. The learning curve impacts the percentage of HP applications.