ONCOLOGY / BASIC RESEARCH
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Introduction:
Thymomas and thymic carcinoma (TC) are the most common neoplasms localised in the thymus. These diseases are poorly understood, but progress made in next-generation sequencing (NGS) technology has provided novel data on their molecular pathology.

Material and methods:
Genomic DNA was isolated from formalin-fixed paraffin- embedded tumour tissue. We investigated somatic variants in 35 thymoma patients using amplicon-based TruSeq Amplicon Cancer Panel (TSACP) that covers 48 cancer related genes. We also analysed three samples from healthy individuals by TSACP platform and 32 healthy controls using exome sequencing.

Results:
The total number of detected variants was 4447, out of which 2906 were in the coding region (median per patient 83, range: 2–300) and 1541 were in the non-coding area (median per patient 44, range: 0–172). We identified four genes, APC, ATM, ERBB4, and SMAD4, having more than 100 protein-changing variants. Additionally, more than 70% of the analysed cases harboured protein-changing variants in SMAD4, APC, ATM, PTEN, KDR, and TP53. Moreover, this study revealed 168 recurrent variants, out of which 15 were shown to be pathogenic. Comparison to controls revealed that the variants we reported in this study were somatic thymoma-specific variants. Additionally, we found that the presence of variants in SMAD4 gene predicted shorter overall survival in thymoma patients.

Conclusions:
The most frequently mutated genes in thymoma samples analysed in this study belong to the EGFR, ATM, and TP53 signalling pathways, regulating cell cycle check points, gene expression, and apoptosis. The results of our study complement the knowledge of thymoma molecular pathogenesis.

 
REFERENCES (30)
1.
Cowen D, Richaud P, Mornex F, et al. Thymoma: results of a multicentric retrospective series of 149 non-metastatic irradiated patients and review of the literature. FNCLCC trialists. Federation Nationale des Centres de Lutte Contre le Cancer. Radioth Oncol 1995; 34: 9-16.
 
2.
Engels EA, Pfeiffer RM. Malignant thymoma in the United States: demographic patterns in incidence and associations with subsequent malignancies. Int J Cancer 2003; 105: 546-51.
 
3.
Tomaszek S, Wigle DA, Keshavjee S, Fischer S. Thymomas: review of current clinical practice. Ann Thorac Surg 2009; 87: 1973-80.
 
4.
Riedel RF, Burfeind WR Jr. Thymoma: benign appearance, malignant potential. Oncologist 2006; 11: 887-94.
 
5.
Okumura M, Ohta M, Tateyama H, et al. The World Health Organization histologic classification system reflects the oncologic behavior of thymoma: a clinical study of 273 patients. Cancer 2002; 94: 624-32.
 
6.
Okuda K, Moriyama S, Haneda H, Kawano O, Nakanishi R. Specific mutations in thymic epithelial tumors. Mediastinum 2017; 1: 16.
 
7.
Raphael BJ, Dobson JR, Oesper L, Vandin F. Identifying driver mutations in sequenced cancer genomes: computational approaches to enable precision medicine. Genome Med 2014; 6: 5.
 
8.
McLaren W, Gil L, Hunt SE, et al. The ensembl variant effect predictor. Genome Biol 2016; 17: 122.
 
9.
Robinson JT, Thorvaldsdottir H, Winckler W, et al. Integrative genomics viewer. Nat Biotechnol 2011; 29: 24-6.
 
10.
Gao J, Aksoy BA, Dogrusoz U, et al. Integrative analysis of complex cancer genomics and clinical profiles using the cBioPortal. Sci Signal 2013; 6: pl1.
 
11.
Cerami E, Gao J, Dogrusoz U, et al. The cBio cancer genomics portal: an open platform for exploring multidimensional cancer genomics data. Cancer Discov 2012; 2: 401-4.
 
12.
Bland JM, Altman DG. The logrank test. BMJ 2004; 328: 1073.
 
13.
Duncavage EJ, Abel HJ, Szankasi P, Kelley TW, Pfeifer JD. Targeted next generation sequencing of clinically significant gene mutations and translocations in leukemia. Mod Pathol 2012; 25: 795-804.
 
14.
Xu H, DiCarlo J, Satya RV, Peng Q, Wang Y. Comparison of somatic mutation calling methods in amplicon and whole exome sequence data. BMC Genom 2014; 15: 244.
 
15.
Petrini I, Rajan A, Pham T, et al. Whole genome and transcriptome sequencing of a B3 thymoma. PLoS One 2013; 8: e60572.
 
16.
Enkner F, Pichlhofer B, Zaharie AT, et al. Molecular profiling of thymoma and thymic carcinoma: genetic differences and potential novel therapeutic targets. Pathol Oncol Res 2017; 23: 551-64.
 
17.
Belani R, Oliveira G, Erikson GA, et al. ASXL1 and DNMT3A mutation in a cytogenetically normal B3 thymoma. Oncogenesis 2014; 3: e111.
 
18.
Chakravarty D, Gao J, Phillips SM, et al. OncoKB: a precision oncology knowledge base. JCO Precis Oncol 2017; 2017: PO.17.00011.
 
19.
Moreira AL, Won HH, McMillan R, et al. Massively parallel sequencing identifies recurrent mutations in TP53 in thymic carcinoma associated with poor prognosis. J Thorac Oncol 2015; 10: 373-80.
 
20.
Zhao T, Wu J, Liu X, Zhang L, Chen G, Lu H. Diagnosis of thymic epithelial tumor subtypes by a quantitative proteomic approach. Analyst 2018; 143: 2491-500.
 
21.
Aoki K, Taketo MM. Adenomatous polyposis coli (APC): a multi-functional tumor suppressor gene. J Cell Sci 2007; 120 (Pt 19): 3327-35.
 
22.
Strobel P, Hohenberger P, Marx A. Thymoma and thymic carcinoma: molecular pathology and targeted therapy. J Thorac Oncol 2010; 5 (10 Suppl 4): S286-90.
 
23.
Choi M, Kipps T, Kurzrock R. ATM mutations in cancer: therapeutic implications. Mol Cancer Ther 2016; 15: 1781-91.
 
24.
Radovich M, Pickering CR, Felau I, et al. The integrated genomic landscape of thymic epithelial tumors. Cancer Cell 2018; 33: 244-58.e10.
 
25.
Yu L, Ke J, Du X, Yu Z, Gao D. Genetic characterization of thymoma. Sci Rep 2019; 9: 2369.
 
26.
Hou Z, Yang J, Wang H, Liu D, Zhang H. A potential prognostic gene signature for predicting survival for glioblastoma patients. BioMed Res Int 2019; 2019: 9506461.
 
27.
Zuo S, Zhang X, Wang L. A RNA sequencing-based six-gene signature for survival prediction in patients with glioblastoma. Sci Rep 2019; 9: 2615.
 
28.
Wang Y, Zhang Q, Gao Z, et al. A novel 4-gene signature for overall survival prediction in lung adenocarcinoma patients with lymph node metastasis. Cancer Cell Int 2019; 19: 100.
 
29.
Cheng Y, Wang S, Han L, et al. Concurrent somatic mutations in driver genes were significantly correlated with lymph node metastasis and pathological types in solid tumors. Oncotarget 2017; 8: 68746-57.
 
30.
Hirsch B, Endris V, Lassmann S, et al. Multicenter validation of cancer gene panel-based next-generation sequencing for translational research and molecular diagnostics. Virchows Archiv 2018; 472: 557-65.
 
eISSN:1896-9151
ISSN:1734-1922
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top