Current issue
Archive
Manuscripts accepted
About the Journal
Editorial office
Editorial board
Abstracting and indexing
Subscription
Contact
Ethical standards and procedures
Most read articles
Instructions for authors
Article Processing Charge (APC)
Regulations of paying article processing charge (APC)
RESEARCH LETTER
Functional status in patients undergoing lung resection
1
Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic
2
Department of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic
3
Department of Surgery, University Hospital Ostrava and Faculty of Medicine University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic
4
Institute of Hygiene, Faculty of Medicine, Comenius University in Bratislava, Slovak Republic
These authors had equal contribution to this work
Submission date: 2024-03-28
Final revision date: 2024-06-26
Acceptance date: 2024-06-26
Online publication date: 2024-07-30
Corresponding author
Petra Macounová
Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic
Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Introduction:
This prospective study aimed to evaluate the functional status and risk factors in patients undergoing lung resection.
Methods:
Functional status defined by the parameters of spirometry (VC, FVC, FEV1, FEV1/FVC) and whole-body plethysmography (TLC) examination was assessed before lung resection, at hospital discharge, 3 weeks after surgery, and 3 months after surgery.
Results:
The sample comprised 24 participants who were observed from 5/2021 to 10/2022. The functional status worsened significantly after the surgery, but the lung function values improved over time.
Conclusions:
Lung functions dropped sharply after the surgery but improved over time.
This prospective study aimed to evaluate the functional status and risk factors in patients undergoing lung resection.
Methods:
Functional status defined by the parameters of spirometry (VC, FVC, FEV1, FEV1/FVC) and whole-body plethysmography (TLC) examination was assessed before lung resection, at hospital discharge, 3 weeks after surgery, and 3 months after surgery.
Results:
The sample comprised 24 participants who were observed from 5/2021 to 10/2022. The functional status worsened significantly after the surgery, but the lung function values improved over time.
Conclusions:
Lung functions dropped sharply after the surgery but improved over time.
REFERENCES (32)
1.
Simanek V, Klecka J, Treska V, Pesek M, Bednárová V. [Combined procedure of pulmonary resection and radiofrequency ablation of lung tumours – case reports]. Rozhl Chir 2013; 92: 205-8.
2.
Peters BA, Pass HI, Burk RD, et al. The lung microbiome, peripheral gene expression, and recurrence-free survival after resection of stage II non-small cell lung cancer. Genome Med 2022; 14: 121.
3.
Doerr F, Stange S, Michel M, et al. Stage I and II small-cell lung cancer – new challenge for surgery. Lung 2022; 200: 505-12.
4.
Mitchell KG, Farooqi A, Ludmir EB, et al. Pulmonary resection is associated with long-term survival and should remain a therapeutic option in oligometastatic lung cancer. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2021; 161: 1497-504.
5.
Jhala H, Harling L, Rodrigo A, et al. Clinicopathological predictors of survival in resected primary lung adenocarcinoma. J Clin Pathol 2022; 75: 310-5.
6.
Colice GL, Shafazand S, Griffin JP, Keenan R, Bolliger CT, American College of Chest Physicians. Physiologic evaluation of the patient with lung cancer being considered for resectional surgery: ACCP evidenced-based clinical practice guidelines (2nd edition). Chest 2007; 132: 161S-77S.
7.
Yu S, Yang L, Xu W, et al. Analysis of tracheal, bronchial, and lung cancer attributable to respiratory system-related risk factors in 204 countries and territories from 1990 to 2019. Arch Med Sci 2024; DOI: https://doi.org/10.5114/aoms/1....
8.
Borilova S, Dusek L, Jakubikova L, et al. Lung cancer in the Czech Republic. J Thorac Oncol 2023; 18: 271-7.
9.
Krejčí D, Pehalová L, Talábová A, et al. Cancer incidence in the Czech Republic. Institute of Health Information and Statistics of the Czech Republic. Published January 31, 2021. Accessed June 2, 2024. Https://www.uzis.cz/res/f/008352/novotvary2018.pdf.
10.
Ulusan A, Ekici M, Dogan I, Sanli M, Isik A. The relationship between preoperative FDG PET/CT uptake and survival in patients with lung cancer. Arch Med Sci 2022; DOI: https://doi.org/10.5114/aoms/1....
11.
Akhtar N, Bansal JG. Risk factors of lung cancer in nonsmoker. Curr Probl Cancer 2017; 41: 328-39.
12.
Eggert JA, Palavanzadeh M, Blanton A. Screening and early detection of lung cancer. Semin Oncol Nurs 2017; 33: 129-40.
13.
The Ministry Decree No. 79/2013 Coll., On the Implementation of Certain Provisions of the Act on Specific Health Services. The Ministry of Health of the Czech Republic. Published April 3, 2013. Accessed June 2, 2024. Https://www.zakonyprolidi.cz/translation/cs/2013-79?Langid=1033.
14.
Graham BL, Steenbruggen I, Miller MR, et al. Standardization of spirometry 2019 update. An official American Thoracic Society and European Respiratory Society Technical Statement. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2019; 200: e70-88.
15.
Ministry of Health of the Czech Republic. [Methodology for the implementation of the population pilot lung cancer early detection program]. Published 2022. Accessed June 2, 2024. Https://www.mzcr.cz/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/Metodika-realizace-populacniho-pilotniho-programu-casneho-zachytu-karcinomu-plic.pdf.
16.
Provazník K, Komárek L (eds.). Manual of prevention in medical practice: comprehensive edition. Fortuna, Prague 2004.
17.
Tomášková H, Šplíchalová A, Šlachtová H, Jirák Z. Comparison of lung cancer risk in black-coal miners based on mortality and incidence. Med Pr 2020; 71: 513-8.
18.
Adams SJ, Stone E, Baldwin DR, Vliegenthart R, Lee P, Fintelmann FJ. Lung cancer screening. Lancet 2023; 401: 390-408.
19.
Lancaster HL, Heuvelmans MA, Oudkerk M. Low-dose computed tomography lung cancer screening: clinical evidence and implementation research. J Intern Med 2022; 292: 68-80.
21.
International Labour Organization. ILO international classification of radiographs of pneumoconiosis. Published February 21, 2023. Accessed June 2, 2024.https://www.ilo.org/global/top....
23.
Tringali G, Milanese G, Ledda RE, Pastorino U, Sverzellati N, Silva M. Lung cancer screening: evidence, risks, and opportunities for implementation. Rofo 2021; 193: 1153-61.
24.
Merta Z, Brhel P, Pazourková M. [Spirometry in clinical practice]. Pracov Lék 2006; 50: 71-4.
25.
Kociánová J. Spirometry – basic examination of the lung function. Vnitr Lek 2017; 63: 889-94.
26.
Ueda K, Hayashi M, Tanaka N, Tanaka T, Hamano K. Long-term pulmonary function after major lung resection. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2014; 62: 24-30.
27.
Shin S, Kong S, Kang D, et al. Longitudinal changes in pulmonary function and patient-reported outcomes after lung cancer surgery. Respir Res 2022; 23: 224.
28.
Gu Z, Wang H, Mao T, et al. Pulmonary function changes after different extent of pulmonary resection under video-assisted thoracic surgery. J Thorac Dis 2018; 10: 2331-7.
29.
De Matteis S, Iridoy-Zulet AA, Aaron S, Swann A, Cullinan P. A new spirometry-based algorithm to predict occupational pulmonary restrictive impairment. Occup Med (Lond) 2016; 66: 50-3.
30.
Wasswa-Kintu S. Relationship between reduced forced expiratory volume in one second and the risk of lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Thorax 2005; 60: 570-5.
31.
Wen Y, Wang D, Zhou M, Zhou Y, Guo Y, Chen W. Potential effects of lung function reduction on health-related quality of life. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2019; 16: 260.
32.
Bobčíková K, Macounová P, Bužgová R, et al. An assessment of quality of life, health, and disability in patients undergoing lung resection. Kontakt 2023; 25: 307-13.
| eISSN: | 1896-9151 |
| ISSN: | 1734-1922 |
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
