ONCOLOGY / RESEARCH PAPER
Development and validation of a pathological model predicting the efficacy of neoadjuvant therapy for breast cancer based on RCB scoring
More details
Hide details
1
Department of Gastroenterology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan 430000, Hubei Province, China., China
2
Department of Pathology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan 430000, Hubei Province, China., China
3
Department of Oncology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan 430000, Hubei Province, China., Chile
These authors had equal contribution to this work
Submission date: 2024-01-25
Final revision date: 2024-04-11
Acceptance date: 2024-04-27
Online publication date: 2024-05-01
Corresponding author
Jingping Yuan
Department of Pathology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan 430000, Hubei Province, China., China
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Introduction:
Breast cancer has become the most prevalent malignant tumor among women globally, posing a serious threat to women's life and health. Neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) has emerged as one of the standard treatment approaches for breast cancer patients. However, due to varying responses to NAT among different patients, significant differences in treatment effectiveness occur, impacting the timely alteration of treatment strategies for patients.
Material and methods:
Based on clinical and pathological characteristics along with the RCB scoring, we utilized a support vector machine (SVM) algorithm to construct a Breast Cancer Pathological Characteristics(PBCS) prediction model. We thoroughly validated the PBCS and compared it to a Pathomics Signatures (PS) prediction model.
Results:
We developed a pathological prediction label, named PS. Subsequently, through univariate and multivariate analysis, we discovered a significant correlation between HER2 and the patients' RCB scores. Integrating HER2 into PS, we constructed a breast cancer pathological prediction model, named PBCS.PBCS exhibits good performance in predicting the effectiveness of postoperative therapy(RCB 0~Ⅰ) in both the training sets (AUC 0.86 [95%CI 0.7988-0.9173])and validation sets(AUC 0.83[95%CI 0.7219-0.9382 ]). In the validation set, PBCS significantly outperforms the PS(AUC 0.65[95%CI 0.5121-0.7886 ]). Calibration curves and clinical decision curves also strongly support PBCS's ability to effectively predict the efficacy of therapy(RCB 0~Ⅰ).
Conclusions:
PBCS can assist clinical and pathological physicians in accurately predicting patients' post-treatment RCB grading before initiating NAT. This offers a new approach to forecast breast cancer patients' responsiveness to NAT, aiding in devising personalized treatment strategies for patients.