Current issue
Archive
Manuscripts accepted
About the Journal
Editorial office
Editorial board
Abstracting and indexing
Subscription
Contact
Ethical standards and procedures
Most read articles
Instructions for authors
Article Processing Charge (APC)
Regulations of paying article processing charge (APC)
CARDIAC SURGERY / CLINICAL RESEARCH
At what flow rate does the aortic valve gradient become severely elevated? Implications for guideline recommendations on aortic valve area cutoffs
1
Department of Medicine, Cardiology Division, Montefiore Medical Center and Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, USA
2
Department of Cardiology, Westchester Medical Center and the Department of Medicine, New York Medical College, Valhalla, New York, USA
Submission date: 2019-12-03
Final revision date: 2020-02-26
Acceptance date: 2020-03-12
Online publication date: 2021-03-21
Arch Med Sci 2024;20(3):713-718
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Introduction:
Aortic stenosis (AS) is considered severe when the aortic valve area (AVA) is < 1.0 cm2 and the mean aortic valve gradient (mAVG) exceeds 40 mm Hg. Since many patients with AVA < 1.0 cm2 do not manifest an mAVG > 40 mm Hg, we sought to determine the AVA at which mAVG tends to exceed 40 mm Hg in a sample of subjects with varied transvalvular flow rates.
Material and methods:
Our echocardiography database was queried for subjects with native valve AS. We selected 200 subjects with an AVA < 1.0 cm2. The sample was selected to include subjects with varied mean systolic flow (MSF) rates. Linear regression was performed to determine the relationship between MSF and mAVG. Since this relationship varied by AVA, the regression was stratified by AVA (critical < 0.6 cm2, severe 0.6–0.79 cm2, moderately severe 0.8–0.99 cm2).
Results:
The study sample was 79 ±12 years old and was 60% female. The MSF rate at which mAVG tended to exceed 40 mm Hg was 120 ml/s for critical AVA, 183 ml/s for severe AVA and 257 ml/s for moderately severe AVA. Those with moderately severe AVA rarely (8%) had an mAVG > 40 mm Hg at a wide range of MSF. In contrast, those with severe AVA typically (75%) had mAVG > 40 mm Hg when MSF was normal (> 200 ml/s). Those with critical AVA frequently (44%) had mAVG > 40 mm Hg, even when MSF was reduced.
Conclusions:
Subjects with AVA of 0.8 and 0.9 cm2 rarely had mAVG > 40 mm Hg, even when the transvalvular flow rate was normal. Using current guidelines, it is not clear if such cases should be classified as severe.
Aortic stenosis (AS) is considered severe when the aortic valve area (AVA) is < 1.0 cm2 and the mean aortic valve gradient (mAVG) exceeds 40 mm Hg. Since many patients with AVA < 1.0 cm2 do not manifest an mAVG > 40 mm Hg, we sought to determine the AVA at which mAVG tends to exceed 40 mm Hg in a sample of subjects with varied transvalvular flow rates.
Material and methods:
Our echocardiography database was queried for subjects with native valve AS. We selected 200 subjects with an AVA < 1.0 cm2. The sample was selected to include subjects with varied mean systolic flow (MSF) rates. Linear regression was performed to determine the relationship between MSF and mAVG. Since this relationship varied by AVA, the regression was stratified by AVA (critical < 0.6 cm2, severe 0.6–0.79 cm2, moderately severe 0.8–0.99 cm2).
Results:
The study sample was 79 ±12 years old and was 60% female. The MSF rate at which mAVG tended to exceed 40 mm Hg was 120 ml/s for critical AVA, 183 ml/s for severe AVA and 257 ml/s for moderately severe AVA. Those with moderately severe AVA rarely (8%) had an mAVG > 40 mm Hg at a wide range of MSF. In contrast, those with severe AVA typically (75%) had mAVG > 40 mm Hg when MSF was normal (> 200 ml/s). Those with critical AVA frequently (44%) had mAVG > 40 mm Hg, even when MSF was reduced.
Conclusions:
Subjects with AVA of 0.8 and 0.9 cm2 rarely had mAVG > 40 mm Hg, even when the transvalvular flow rate was normal. Using current guidelines, it is not clear if such cases should be classified as severe.
REFERENCES (13)
1.
Nishimura RA, Otto CM, Bonow RO, et al. 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2014; 148: e1-e132.
2.
Baumgartner H, Falk V, Bax JJ, et al. 2017 ESC/EACTS guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease. Eur Heart J 2017; 38: 2739-91.
3.
Minners J, Aligeier M, Gohlke-Baerwolf C, et al. Inconsistencies of echocardiographic criteria for the grading of aortic valve stenosis. Eur Heart J 2008; 29: 1043-8.
4.
Eleid MF, Sorajja P, Michelena HI, et al. Flow-gradient patterns in severe aortic stenosis with preserved ejection fraction: clinical characteristics and predictors of survival. Circulation 2013; 128: 1781-9.
5.
Clavel MA, Magne J, Pibarot P. Low-gradient aortic stenosis. Eur Heart J 2016; 37: 2645-57.
6.
Blais C, Burwash IG, Mundigier G, et al. Projected valve area at normal flow rate improves the assessment of stenosis severity in patients with low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis: the multicenter TOPAS (Truly or Pseudo-Severe Aortic Stenosis) study. Circulation 2006; 113: 711-21.
7.
Hachicha Z, Dumesnil JG, Bogaty P, Pibarot P. Paradoxical low-flow, low-gradient severe aortic stenosis despite preserved ejection fraction is associated with higher afterload and reduced survival. Circulation 2007; 115: 2856-64.
8.
Ploriska-Gosciniak E, Lipiec P, Lancellotti P, et al. Prognostic value of low-dose dobutamine stress echocardiography in patients with aortic stenosis and impaired left ventricular function. Arch Med Sci 2013; 9: 434-9.
9.
Romero J, Chavez P, Goodman-Meza D, et al. Outcomes in patients with various forms of aortic stenosis including those with low-flow low-gradient normal and low ejection fraction. Am J Cardiol 2014; 114: 1069-74.
10.
Chahal NS, Drakopoulou M, Gonzalez-Gonzalez AM, Manivarmane R, Khattar R, Senior R. Resting aortic valve area at normal transaortic flow rate reflects true valve area in suspected low-gradient severe aortic stenosis. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2015; 8: 1133-9.
11.
Saeed S, Senior R, Chahai NS, et al. Lower transaortic flow rate Is associated with increased mortality in aortic valve stenosis. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2017; 10: 912-20.
12.
Vamvakidou A, Chahal N, Senior R. Lack of stroke volume determined flow reserve does not always preclude assessment of severity of aortic stenosis in low-flow low-gradient state during dobutamine echocardiography. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2017; 10: 491-3.
13.
Voelker W, Reul H, Nienhaus G, et al. Comparison of valvular resistance, stroke work loss, and Gorlin valve area for quantification of aortic stenosis. An in vitro study in a pulsatile aortic flow model. Circulation 1995; 91: 1196-204.
| eISSN: | 1896-9151 |
| ISSN: | 1734-1922 |
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
